They said that the government should raise the driving age but, I say they shouldn't because according to an article by A. J. Rox, 16 year old crash the most often because they are experienced because they are starting driving. But, if you start at the age 16, you’ll be just as inexperienced as a 16 year old driver, so it’s not helping the cause. Therefore, 18 year olds will be just as inexperienced as a new young driver.

They say that they should raise the driving age, but I say that they shouldn't raise it because teens need cars to be able to transport themselves from place to place. If the driving age goes up, kids won't be able to get jobs as soon, because they won't have the ability to take themselves there. If kids can't bring themselves to places, they won’t get jobs until they're 18, and it will be very hard for companies to find people to work at their restaurants or stores. Then, that might lead to fewer of those kinds of places.

They say the driving age should be raised to 18, but I say that I think that the driving age should stay because inexperience is the reason not the age, “The fact of the matter is driving is based on experience and being able to make good choices. Sixteen-year-old drivers crash mostly because of inexperience. If the driving age is raised then 18 year old will also crash because of inexperience.” said by A.J. Rox in Driving age should not be raised. Therefore safety will not play a cause in raising the age.

Therefore, cars would be a lot more helpful than waiting, walking and biking around so like in the winter it would be hard to get around to different places so I think that they should keep the driving age down and keep it where its at.

They say that changing the driving age will benefit Wisconsin and/or America. But not only do I disagree, but most of the millions of teenagers without a license will disagree too. So imagine this: Your 16th birthday is in 4 days, you've already bought a car, but then the driving age turns to 18 or 21. What will you do with that car? (Probably get mad) So, I disagree because of the millions of teenagers that will be disappointed of the age being raised. And what good will it do to just delay it? People also say that as you age you get more mature, but maturity can't always be a deciding factor. There are people in their 20's who are more immature than a 10 year old! Therefore, I vote to not change the driving age, at least let people decide when they want to start driving! (Over 16 of course)

Phillip says that the driving age should be raised because teens joke around with driving, but I say the driving age should not be raised because studies also show that risky effects of males beginning around 16-23 years old, so you can't just ban males from driving until a good age. Most 16 year olds find out when they first start driving is that driving is not a game, it’s a serious matter. So, it’s best if they start driving at age 16 so they can figure out the serious matters in driving. Therefore, once teens start driving they will realize it's a serious matter.

Fletcher said that they should change the driving age to 18 because the road will be safer, but I disagree. I think the driving age should be left at 16 because when teens are at the age 18, they are more experimental, because they are just getting out of school, and everything is new. That could lead to them wanting to know what would happen if they did something on the road. When kids are 16, they still get worried about little things, and would pay closer attention to little things, because they would be on edge. When teens are 18, they think that they are old enough to do anything, and they can take their lives into their own hands, because they are finally 18. They might take that a little too far, and make some bad decisions. Therefore, leaving the driving age at 16 wouldn't cause for many more crashes than when people are 18.

Since people are getting in wrecks and getting killed or hurt, people are like taking drivers licenses away from other people that had nothing to do with it and I think that that is not right and I don't think that's right because you can't just blame and take things away from people that has had nothing to do with it so that is not right.

people say that the driving age should be incresed but I say it should stay because it will do nothing. In The Driving age Should not be Raised they said. If the driving age is raised then 18 year olds will also crash because of inexperience. This means that the death rate of 18 year olds will increase, while the death of 16-year-old death rate; will increase. We are not helping the cause by raising the driving age we are just delaying the time they will die. and also in the same article they said. Raising the driving age is not only just a bad idea, it does absolutely nothing to help except for delay death for only a short time. Therefore we will just have older people dying insetead of younger ones.

They say that most of the 16 year old in America have jobs, so if people decide to increase the driving age not a lot of 16 year olds will be able to get to work (A bike only is good in summer and when it's not freezing or snowing.) I agree that they shouldn't increase the driving age because all of the fast food places where 16 year olds usually work will closed because none of the 16 year olds will get to work, there for increasing the driving age will end closing down a lot buisnesses.

They say that the driving age should be raised to prevent so many teens from dying in accidents but I disagree with that because A.J. Rox said most kids start working when they about 16, so how are they supposed to get to work? Therefore kids should be able to drive to work and school events.

They say that we should change the driving age but I say that we shouldn't because a lot of the crashes are by teenager but how wouldn't they become better driver if the age limit was change and I they need to go places how are they going to get there they can't walk everywhere,their parents can't always help them so what are they going to do. Therefore if they keep the age limit the same they can drive them self where ever they need and it will make them better drivers if they had more experience.

They say that the driving age should be raised but I disagree with that because once someone turns 16 they were looking forward to getting their license. And be ready to become a good responsible driver. The age limit would change and they won't be able to drive to work or school events and their parents would drive them consistently . Therefore they should learn the responsibility and drive themselves anywhere.

Fletcher said the driving age should be raised, but I say it shouldn't because even though there were 30,000 deaths of 15-17 year olds in the years 1995-2004, but these statistics decreased, according to EHow News, when some restrictions were placed on 16 year old drivers. Therefore, with just a few restrictions, the death rate decreased and 16 year olds can still drive.

Fletcher said that they should put the diving age up but I disagree because it's not the ages driving the car its the people driving the car.

Evan says that, ages for drivers licenses shouldn't be raised and I agree with all the stuff he said and I think this because I don't think raising it would do anything and the age doesn't do anything its the people driving.

They say that most 16 year olds have jobs so, they need transportation to get their, a bike can’t do much in winter, therefore raising the driver age will make people not be able to get much transportation by themselves

Luke said that people are taking away drivers licenses because they are getting into creases and kill or hurt someone. But that isn't far for the driver because the don't do it on propose. Therefore people shouldn't get their licenses taken away from them for doing something bad.